External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bethel, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bethel, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

n-word? edit

I don't think we're supposed to be bowdlerized. WP:BOWDLERIZE says not to; that's only a guideline, but it makes sense to me I guess, altho it'd be reasonable to disagree. But for one thing, we get a lot of non-native speakers here, and they might not know what "n-word" means. For another thing, we have actual pictures in the Wikipedia of people doing all sorts of peculiar (and sometimes alarming) sexual things to each other, so apparently we're not super squeamish. On the other hand, we shouldn't have those pictures IMO so maybe we should be a little squeamish.

But anyway, WP:BOWDLERIZE says that if we're quoting we're allowed to follow the source ("John Smith wrote they were 'yelling the n-word like there was no tomorrow' and shooting guns" or whatever). On the other hand, our use of "n-word" in the article as it stands is not a direct quote. But it could probably be re-written as a direct quote. But then you have the problem of people in India not knowing what we're saying, and anyway I'm not sure if digging up and using a direct quote would be called for except on grounds of squeamishness. The good citizens of Bethel, Ohio are who they are, and they said what they said, and we're supposed to report facts without fear or favor.

Taken all together, I replaced "n-word" with the actual word, subject to BRD and discussion. It doesn't make me happy to do it, but I guess its in line with what we do here. Herostratus (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Only place in Ohio to have a witch trial edit

Not sure if this belongs in the history section or not. Figured I would bring it up in the talk section.

Bethel was the only location in Ohio to have a witch trial. That designation seems like a significant part of history.

In 1805, Nancy Evans was put on trial for being a witch after her neighbor's children started throwing fits. Nancy Evans was found not guilty after the court weighed her at her trial and she weighed more than a Bible. 1 2 3

I'll leave this tidbit here and let other editors decide how to proceed. P37307 (talk) 10:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply