Talk:Berwyn Heights, Maryland mayor's residence drug raid/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • There was an edit made on Feb. 1st by an anon IP that changed some wording in the lead. In my opinion, it made the lead slightly POV. I have reverted the edit - if you feel that I was in the wrong, please let me know.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • I've added a couple of fact tags in places where I would like to see references. These two places are especially important because the preceeding sentences include direct quotes.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Overall this is a very nice article. There are a couple of places where I would like to see references, and one comment on prose, so I am placing this review on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
    OK, looks good. I'm now passing the article to GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply