Talk:Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation

Untitled

I just did a LexisNexis search to find some sources. There were only two articles in the San Francisco Chronicle about Berkeley Nucleonics. One was from August 20, 2001, Pg. B5, business section, titled "Marin firm charged with export violations: Devices sent to India can be used in nuclear weapons, grand jury says." The other was from July 15, 2001, Pg. A23, titled "Marin firm entangled in sting: Electronic device sold to India can be used in nuclear weapons." This might be enough to make the business notable, though they were the only two articles I could find. I'm not sure so I didn't remove the {{WP:NOTE}} flag. --Smtomak 21:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't know if adding the info about the sanctions violations is relevant or fair to the company. I can't even find out what the outcome was. The case might have been thrown out, in which case, who cares? --Smtomak 21:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011080921/http://www.laboratorytalk.com/news/bek/bek000.html to http://www.laboratorytalk.com/news/bek/bek000.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)