Talk:Bergkamen

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This sounds almost like an advertisement for the city... I am from the town, and have a slightly less positive point of view of it... so I shall refrain from changing this, it would be a lot less positive. Can somebody a little more objective do something about this?76.20.165.118 21:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

In fact, this article omits several key aspects of the city, the history, the role of coal mining, the impact of mine closings on the economy, etc. I don't want to translate the German entry, and if I were to write my own info, it would be heavily biased, so I won't do it. Yet. 76.20.145.54 02:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bergkamen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply