This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The number of Carthaginian troops present does not match up with the casualty sums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.185.54 (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Someone created a redirect that messes with the template Third Punic War. There are two battles in this template, the first in 149 BC and the second in 147 BC. Why were these two merged? It makes no sense to merge two battles separated by two years. The least you can do when you merge two articles like that is to leave a note on the talk page explaining why. Damn it. T8612(talk) 13:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
