Talk:Battle of Cahuenga Pass
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adding references
editI have no idea how to add references and links to an article. I am still reading the tutorial. --Desertphile (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you need help placing referenced, you can place the raw references on the talk page (e.g. links, books and their authors, page numbers, articles, etc.) --Sigma 7 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- < ref > Last, First Name. ' ' Title ' '. Date. Retrieved Date. < / ref >.
- Or just add a = = References = = section and bullet ( * ) your references there. -LlywelynII (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
This article has 'em. -LlywelynII (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Better sourcing needed
editMuch of the battle description and other information comes from a website, www.militarymuseum.org, which has no verifiable sourcing. RefImprove tag added to this section. WCCasey (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)