Talk:Batman and Robin (comic book)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

All Star

edit

This is what All Star Batman should have been. Thank god for Morrison. First this, Final Crisis, R.I.P., there's no stopping Grant Morrison, and Frank Quitely for this soon to-be DC comics classic. :) (JoeLoeb (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC))Reply

1) Not what this board is for.

2) You are also wrong. 214.3.138.234 (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)SteveReply

Name

edit

Following WP:NCC this should really be at Batman and Robin (comics). Thoughts? (Emperor (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC))Reply

I thought about that when I initially created the article, but decided on "comic book" for a couple of different reasons. 1) Batman and Robin are comics related anyways, so the parenthetical "comics" is a little vague. And 2)There was a similar discussion for 52, which started with "comics," but was changed to "comic book" because the comics tag lacked description. 52 in comics what? That's chiefly why I decided on "comic book," it lets people know that this is a publication instead of leading them to believe we're doing an article on the team of Batman and Robin in the comics. I see that 52 has since changed to "comics," but I still find it a little vague. I'm not opposed to it, but it should possibly be a matter for WikiProject Comics to determine. --CmdrClow (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Paralyzed?

edit

Who shot Damian? The Flamingo or Jason Todd? I read the comics but even that, it wasn't too clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.242.5 (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Infobox cover

edit

The cover in the infobox has been changed from the regular Frank Quitely cover to the variant cover. Since Quitely is the interior artist and his cover is the primary one, the cover should be switched back. Thoughts?--Marcus Brute (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The variant has always been showcased in the infobox since the title was first published in June, and there are no parameters in the policies that would guide against it. The cover is a bit more dynamic than the regular cover, so I have no problem with it remaining. --CmdrClow (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Story

edit

First of all the story only goes up to issue 12. Everything after that is handled in other mini arcs that don't matter or the Return of Bruce Wayne. Now my suggestion is, and I'm doing it, is put a link at the bottom that says: the rest of the story is covered in the Return of Bruce Wayne. Any thoughts, and don't bring J Greb. Emperor please and Cameron be reasonable. --Schmeater (talk) 04:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Batman And Robin.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Batman And Robin.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Batman and Robin (comic book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Plot is overly detailed

edit

The plot "summary" for volume one is currently over 4000 words, averaging 157 words per issue. I'm not familiar enough with the story to trim it the way it should be. Can anyone help? Thanks, Argento Surfer (talk) 14:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batman and Robin (comic book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply