This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Isn't making a separate page for this rather pedantic? This is just a regional variant of Baybayin. Rajavlitra23 (talk) 07:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Basahan is inlisted in the Vocabularyo de la legua bikol of Marcos de Lisboa, Maybe we did´nt subsumed --Shimin_Ufesoj (🦜) 11:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
From what I see here, the letter shapes are generally identical to Baybayin. The Visyan Badlit script diverges a bit more, but still redirects to the main Baybayin article. Unless you want to give Badlit its own article like Kulitan did, I'm not sure what this article even brings to the table. Rajavlitra23 (talk) 12:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
ᜰᜲᜫᜲᜨ᜴ ᜢᜩᜲᜰᜳᜧ᜴