Talk:Barchester Towers

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Treatment of Mrs. Proudie edit

Whether it is conscious or not on Trollope's part, the treatment of Mrs. Proudie reveals the frustrations of ambitious women in his era. In another culture she might have been a good leader; in Barsetshire she is forced to work through her husband, and gets criticized and ridiculed for that. Some of her actions are actually admirable, such as forcing the corrupt Rev. Stanhope to carrry out his duties. Whether or not he approved of the oddities of Victorian culture, Trollope was at least aware that more than one point of view was possible. CharlesTheBold (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barchester Towers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply