Talk:Banton, Romblon/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Bilorv in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bilorv (talk · contribs) 19:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Specific comments

edit
  • The lead is extremely short: it should be 2-3 paragraphs for an article of this length.
  • Banton is already inhabited during pre-colonial times — change "is" to "was".
  • Under "Modern history", "Jones" should not be in bold.
  • The "Tourism" section appears to be completely unsourced.
  • A large portion of the "Local government" section appears to be unsourced, as is the last paragraph in "Demographics".
  • The article is not neutral, containing passages like: World-class reefs in the island, perfect for snorkeling and scuba diving.
  • Places listed under the "Tourism" section shouldn't be in bold.
  • The education system in Banton is not even mentioned.
  • Why was the location originally called "Banton"?
  • Does Banton have a coat of arms?
  • "Copra" should be linked.
  • The article contains few references.
  • Things in the infobox like the demonym of "Bantoanon" are unsourced.

The article is also very small compared to other GA geography articles. See, for example, Chiprovtsi for a good municipality article.

Fail for GA: This article currently does not meet the GA criteria. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 19:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply