Talk:Balkan ethnic conflict in the 1940s
Latest comment: 15 years ago by GregorB in topic Proposed redirect
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
It's only stub really - the thing was REALLY bloody, complicated AND multi-sided. --HanzoHattori 13:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Proposed redirect
editThis article has numerous faults that make it unsalvageable:
- It is unsourced - of the two refs given, the first leads nowhere and the second is dead;
- It is hopelessly POV and unbalanced;
- It is a content fork of Ustaše and Independent State of Croatia;
- The article's creator and only substantive contributor is indeffed.
Therefore, unless anyone objects by the weekend, I will redirect this to Independent State of Croatia. I'll wait to see if anyone thinks it worth saving before I do though. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree - unless it can be improved significantly, the article should be replaced with a redirect. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I also agreee... --Čeha (razgovor) 20:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
btw article does not speaks anything about crimes comited by Serbian Chetniks.... --Čeha (razgovor) 20:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Rename to "Serbian Genocide", and EXPAND. (LAz17 (talk) 06:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)). Maybe toss that information into here, World War II persecution of Serbs (LAz17 (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)).
- I've prodded the article. Let me just note that while its content duplicates Independent State of Croatia, its title does not. (This is, in fact, one of the problems with the article: it purports to describe a wider issue, but ends up covering only one side of it.) That's why a redirect would not be a good solution. GregorB (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)