Talk:Bad Girl (Confessions of a Shopaholic song)/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment

---

Observations

   HTML document size: 102 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 6633 B
   References (including all HTML code): 11 kB
   Wiki text: 8562 B
   Prose size (text only): 3964 B (690 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 2822 B

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Page has two infoboxes due two productions of this song (released) and (leaked) for this film. Infoboxes accepted.
• The lead provides a reasonable introduction.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• Reference 1 is an archived purchase link on Amazon. (not admissible)
• Reference 2 is a play sample (Primary, not a proper reference)
• Reference 3 is about the leaked version of this song. (OK)
• Reference 4 is about the two versions of this song soundtrack and leaked version. (OK)
• Reference 5 is a review of all songs on the film - this song gets a mention. Is all. (mention, only)
• Reference 6 is a dead link. (About Rhianna chart history.)
• Earwig copyvio check gives a 74% copyvio from this source.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• The references do not give a sufficiently broad coverage of this song track.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• Opinions about two different recordings of this song by different groups are presented.
• There is criticism going each way in the references.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

• Page created 8 March 2012
• Page has 103 edits by 49 editors
• 90 day page views = 706 with a daily average of 8 page views
• Page obtained GA status 12 May 2012
• InternetArchiveBot has rescued two dead links;
• Page has been subject to a number of move discussions due participation by different artists.
• Page history shows stability, no edit warring observed

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• Page has one image appropriately labelled and licensed.
• File:Pussycat Dolls w trasie koncertowej z Britney Spears.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

1. Notifying Editors:

• Page Creator Calvin999 notified;
• Editor Ser Amantio di Nicolao notified;
• Editor Status notified;
• Editor Razr Nation notified;
• Editor Wikipedian Penguin notified;
• Editor Aoba47 notified;
• A total of six involved editors were able to be notified.

---

1. Overall:

• There is a serious copy violation here which forms a major part of this article.
• References do not provide a broad coverage.
• Discussion is opened to involved editors. Considered not to merit GA status at this review. --Whiteguru (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

 

 On hold for one week

 

• Comment. The 74% copyvio source says: "Source: [2]. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
  • noted and struck out --Whiteguru (talk) 02:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

 

    Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)