Talk:Baby Jake

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 90.255.245.171 in topic Controversial?

know which windmill

edit

Does anyone know which windmill was used in this show? It is quite distinctive having 6 blades, being rather high and with a balcony around the middle. I believe it is in the UK, perhaps the Midlands, somewhere. 62.232.250.50 (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Think I found it: Sibsey Trader Mill 62.232.250.50 (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hamsternauts

edit

Although the Hamsternauts are hamsters, I think they are distinct enough from the real world animals that it is not correct to have a pointer to the Wikipedia hamster page. It's kind of like pointing "Donald Duck" to the animal duck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.95.153.91 (talk) 09:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baby Jake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Controversial?

edit

First paragraph refers to this show as controversial. No real further detail in this regard is provided, nor is this concern cited. 90.255.245.171 (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply