Talk:BIRCH
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BIRCH article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editWikipedia, this is a very important paper. It received the 2006 ACM SIGMOD Test of Time Award. http://www.sigmod.org/awards/ Search for BIRCH. Do NOT delete this.
Ovi
Another source
editBIRCH has more than a half-page of coverage in Fundamentals of Database Systems, Sixth Edition, by Elmasri and Navathe on page 1056. I don't know exactly how someone wants this cited, so I leave this as a project for someone else who is interested. Marc W. Abel (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on BIRCH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100523062258/http://www.sigmod.org:80/sigmod-awards/citations/2006-sigmod-test-of-time-award-1 to http://www.sigmod.org/sigmod-awards/citations/2006-sigmod-test-of-time-award-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)