Talk:Azraq, Jordan

Jordan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestion edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Qasr Azraq does not seem to add a lot to the article about Azraq (Jordan). I therefore suggest to merge it into that article. --Mmounties (Talk) 15:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The original Qasr Azraq article didn't add much to the Azraq (Jordan) article as you say. I did a bit of preliminary search just to get the page going. I've just expanded the article more and will continue to do so. I think the subject is sufficiently interesting to merit a separate article. I will also develop the Azraq (Jordan) to add much more detail there too. Nick Fraser 08:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Got it. I'll remove the merge tag then. Can I ask you a favor though? When you write, can you please make sure that you link to articles (as opposed to disambiguation pages). You had linked to "Roman" (a disambig page), that's how I came across it, and I just saw someone else fixed the link to "Ottoman" (another disambiguation page). You can easily check where your link really leads without losing your edits by clicking it in Preview. Just use the Back button to get back to the page in Preview with all your edits. --Mmounties (Talk) 14:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Yes, I'll make sure I link directly to the articles rather then disambiguation pages in future. Nick Fraser 15:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Azraq, Jordan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722071314/http://www.dos.gov.jo/dos_home/census2004/cen04_3.pdf/table_3_1.pdf to http://www.dos.gov.jo/dos_home/census2004/cen04_3.pdf/table_3_1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic