Talk:Avro 626
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Avro 626 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
It would be good to know:
more about the Tatra builds, with a ref;
if the Portuguese did build any under licence? JAWA 1942 notes the 626 as "at present in production" but no numbers.
did the Chinese really "build one themselves " ref? According to Jackson they got 9 from Avro; www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_VR-H.htm suggests at least 2 of AJJ's 4 demonstrators went to the Chinese gov. as well.
where did the Spanish aircraft originate (there were folk from both sides buying all sorts of aircraft across Europe at the time)?;
TSRL (talk) 21:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
It would also be good to have a shot of a typical three seat 621 (say the NZ survivor) taken from above to show the three places for two crew layout. The RAF Prefects were not representative in that respect.TSRL (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and is ZK-APC still active in 2008?TSRL (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Avro 626. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120060246/http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_VR-H.htm to http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_VR-H.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008145427/http://www.airforcemuseum.co.nz/main/avro626/ to http://www.airforcemuseum.co.nz/main/avro626/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 22 October 2016 (UTC)