Talk:Aviation light signals

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

different cat.

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I suggest to use Category:Technical communication. It is controlled by humans (at least through programming machines) and understood by the cockpit crew. The method is done technically by the lights. That is comparable to traffic signals on the road which are executed by technology, not humans. 119.42.82.214 (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions for Completeness

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article as it currently stands has been aptly classified as a stub, meaning it provides little meaningful content. Though the material itself isn’t incomprehensible — on the contrary, it is rather succinct in its delivery — it provides little to no context as to the importance of the topic at hand.

If we compare the current piece on aviation signals to the already existing piece on regular traffic signals, the issues become rather telling. The article covering traffic signals provides all sorts of additional context on the topic — from the history of its development, details behind the technology that makes up the system, to all sorts of regional variants currently in use, down to the legal implications of the system on modern driving culture. Any of these topics is likely a good candidate for further content additions to the piece on aviation traffic signals.

Structurally the piece barely even qualifies as an article at the moment — its best described as a paragraph and a table sharing the same page. The lack of any subheadings or a table of contents, features that are somewhat iconic of articles on Wikipedia, paints a grim picture as to the amount of content currently being presented. Furthermore, there’s likely a lot more that could be done with regards to cross-referencing to other relevant articles, as its one of the defining features of the modern encyclopedia. Particularly when it comes to the more technical aspects of operation and when describing brightness, additional context would be greatly appreciated.

The easy solution, as offered by Wikipedia guidelines themselves, is to add more referenced information justifying the topic’s importance. In fact, the article already contains a decent number of references that are likely not being exploited to their fullest potential, so there’s plenty that could be done with the references that have already been gathered. 2607:FEA8:1B9F:9D40:45D1:C776:4E92:3AC2 (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic