Talk:Australian rules football leagues in regional Queensland

Fair use rationale for Image:GeelongDesign.png

Image:GeelongDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:StKildaDesign.png

Image:StKildaDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WestCoastDesign.png

Image:WestCoastDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PortAdelaideDesign.png

Image:PortAdelaideDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BrisbaneLionsDesign.png

Image:BrisbaneLionsDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:EssendonDesign.png

Image:EssendonDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CollingwoodDesign.png

Image:CollingwoodDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HawthornDesign.png

Image:HawthornDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Moved from other location

OK. I have major conflicts with the sourcing of the 1984 Bundaberg Australian Football League Premiers. I have the Grand Final report in the Bundaberg News Mail on 3 September 1984 which quotes the Hervey Bay side as "Urangan". In the Hervey Bay Observer dated 5 September 1984, it clearly states Hervey Bay Seahawks as the Premiers, which is the same team as 1982 and 1983. Wikipedia insists it is Urunga. That is a New South Wales town and is incorrect. Someone incorrectly listed this in a future edition of the Bundaberg News Mail, but wont state the date of the edition. The writer of the article is wrong. In various websites, including the Bundaberg/Wide Bay AFL website, it lists Hervey Bay as the 1984 Premiers. The Hervey Bay Australian Rules Football Club lists that it won the title in 1984, as it did in 1982 and 1983, to make it 3 in a row. The only website that does not is Wikipedia. I have sourced many newspapers and am willing to accept the winner as: Urangan (Hervey Bay AFC). Please let the true facts be included, as many club members and associates from other clubs are laughing at the "Wiki" site and treat the content as a joke. I have spent 34 hours searching microfilm at the State Library in Queensland, and have tried to change it to the correct status, only to have someone change it back. Please email me, whoever reads this: [email address removed] I will supply my mobile to talk about it if you like. Anthonypatto (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)AntpattoAnthonypatto (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Firstly, you have placed the conversation on the wrong talk page. This talk page is the one that this conversation should be taking place on.

Second, the News Mail is a daily newspaper. You admit to there being a clash of information, but if there is a clash, the more reliable source prevails. As the News Mail is a daily and the Observer is not, the default source is the News Mail. Whilst the date may not be present, you have equally failed to cite the source correctly.

I am going to do my own investigation on this as I have some research to do on that year of that league anyway. I have a suspicion, and I will be pursuing it. That is that Urangan and the Hervey Bay Hawks in 1985 are the same club. Clubs do have a habit of hiding problems in their history, but I have to confirm it. 58.171.131.7 (talk) 04:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

It's Urunga. You must have read that wrong. Can't be helped if the name is also the name of a town in New South Wales. I know what I saw. Not only that, the league is a more reliable source than the club and the league would be been responsible for the contributions to the Bundaberg News Mail as that is where the league was based. All other locations are wrong and when 58 comes back I'm certain it will be confirmed. The idea that Urunga were the Hervey Bay Hawks in 1985 makes sense. 60.230.8.53 (talk) 02:39, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

No, bud, I have now examined the News Mail (that's me with the 58 above) and it's definitely Urangan. I have now sourced what happened and added it to the article. Internal issues were mentioned and here's the exact quote; BAFL officials are hopeful Hervey Bay is over internal problems which caused the reigning premier to forfeit last week's first round match. It was clarified later in the year with this; The Bay team became Urangan this season after initial attempts to form two clubs in the area. Put the two together and it suggests a folding and resurrection. They got the two clubs in 1985. I couldn't confirm if Urangan and Hervey Bay Hawks were the same club or not, but Urangan were never referred to as the Seahawks, Hawks or Bombers. Just "The Bay". This should put the matter to rest once and for all. Footy Freak7 (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

A couple more points for the rash of recent edits. Any clubs that played no more than a few games (ie Burnett Heads in 87 allegedly and Maryborough in 2000) have the games scrubbed and are not considered part of the end of season ladder. The reserve grade (except where noted) is not notable so it should not be mentioned at all. Also, there is no record of what guernsey Urangan wore in verifiable sources - and if they had you would have thought the News Mail would have called them the Seahawks. But they didn't (as sourced above). I will say though, thanks for the correction to 2002. That slipped by me. Footy Freak7 (talk) 06:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Some people can't read. Hopefully the edit summaries will help. Additionally, there is NO record of Gympie playing in the BWB comp in 1989. Footy Freak7 (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

The incorrect cites made by Antpatto were misprints incidentally on the information I have (re Gympie). Adding 1983 to the first paragraph is bad grammar because 1983 is mentioned in the next paragrapg and must therefore be kept seperate. Footy Freak7 (talk) 01:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Changes

There was a plethora of non notable material in the AFL Wide Bay section that needed to be removed. If the league is notable a seperate article would be needed. This article is about the competitions in brief and there is no need for ladders and scores and so on. Both Antpatto44 and Footy Freak7 would have to demonstrate how this information is notable and why it shouldn't be placed in a new article as AFL Cairns and AFL Capricornia already have. Ta. Dragonfire X (talk) 06:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Western Bulldogs Jumper.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Western Bulldogs Jumper.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:West Coast Eagles Jumper.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:West Coast Eagles Jumper.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

AFL Wide Bay

I have restored the consensus ruling of the AfD re this league as the new page hadn't provided any new material. In fact there were several comments that were controversial and lacked cites. It is poor form to completely ignore that AfD result without at the very least seeking comment on this talk page or through more formal channels. Footy Freak7 (talk) 08:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian rules football leagues in regional Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719031631/http://www.twincitylionsafc.org.au/ to http://www.twincitylionsafc.org.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)