Talk:Austen submachine gun

error in statement

With the Austen Mk 1 this statement is totally incorrect "They remained in service as a standard weapon of the Australian Army until 1966."

The weapon was unloved, so to speak, and it was the Owen Machine Carbine, OMC, which was the standard weapon till 1966.

The Austen was only used in WWII. The OMC was used right through from 1942 to the early stages of the Vietnam conflict, 1966, till it was replaced by the F1.

This need correcting. TDR 15:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

The connection with the MP40 goes further than the grips. The Austen internals are more like the MP40, and so its reliability problems were the same. The dual row magazine had a lot of inter-cartridge friction, causing jams. Any damage to the magazine, or receiver, made it even worse. The die-cast parts may have been cheap and quick, but they amplified the problems present in the considerably stronger stamped-steel MP40. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.77.117 (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

The Austen was a blowback open bolt system. The owner of the article should add this in the info box top left. THe Austen was indeed essentially a copy of the MP40. It wasn't as good as the OMC, but it was better than the Sten. MP40 jams were caused by excessive side force while holding the magazine as a grip. Soldiers soon learned not to do that. The police Thompson (M28) was also used in significant numbers by the RAAF and AIF, although the military M42 was not procured by Australia. It was quite expensive at $200USD and was not available after 1941.203.213.63.81 (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Austen MkI.jpg

Image:Austen MkI.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Somebody keeps vandalizing this page, i'm going to protext it until further notice, thanks. -- The Furher —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.37.18 (talk) 09:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austen submachine gun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512191257/http://www.diggerhistory.info:80/pages-weapons/allied_ww2.htm to http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-weapons/allied_ww2.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724182050/http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/1060/27144882.png to http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/1060/27144882.png

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)