Talk:Attributions for poverty
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 September 2020 and 14 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ibbrody.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Flibirigit (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that individual attributions for poverty predict support for egalitarian policy?
- ALT1:... that attributions for poverty can be changed with a simple writing exercise?
Created by Ibbrody (talk). Self-nominated at 03:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC).
- Note: Nominator is a WikiEd student editor
- Note: Nominator is a WikiEd student editor for the Fall 2020 term at UCLA. (course link) The course ends on December 15, 2020.. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- This article would require significant work to become eligible. The introduction, as it stands, is too technical, and does not clearly situate the topic with respect to other articles. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ibbrody and Arbitrarily0: Those issues are not part of the DYK criteria. This is not a GA review. This article looks like it's pretty close, it may just need a few more citations, unless other issues are found in a full review. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 01:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Antony-22: The article also has an original research tag, so unless that is resolved, this cannot be approved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- The nominator hasn't edited since the 10th and their course has ended. Article issues remain, including an OR tag. Marking for closure as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)