Talk:Attack (computing)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reassessment Comments edit

To move the article from C-class to B-class I would consider the follow at a minimum:

  1. incorporate as many of the "see also" items into the article as would be logical; don't just shove them in anywhere.
  2. consider adding other sections about Attacks including famous attacks, how to prevent attacks, the business market that grew into existence because of attacks, etc.
  3. consider including more sources or increase inline references to some of the currently unsourced comments and paragraphs.

§ Music Sorter § (talk) 07:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Attack (computing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply