Talk:Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 100 metres relay

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Australia

edit

Why is Australia included in the table, coloured in, with no rank? the page has no explanation. Tim (Xevious) (talk) 10:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

They qualified but withdrew.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - and thanks for adding it to the article too. Tim (Xevious) (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Does anyone know why they withdrew?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.63.190.247 (talk) 04:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

100 metre vs 100 metres relay

edit

The IAAF website lists the event as the 100 "metres" relay. see here in the events timetable. I think this should be moved to Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's 4x100 metres relay. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

DNF/DQ

edit

To my non-specialist eyes, it looks surprising that 6 of the 16 teams in round 1 were either disqualified or did not finish. Is this unusual, and if so is there a reason? --Delirium (talk) 21:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 100 metres relay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply