Talk:Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 19 June 2013 by reviewer Davidwr (talk · contribs).

Astronomy: Cosmology Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Needs introduction at a comprehension level which does not require knowledge of a specialised area of physics edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently this reads like a specialised physics text book. That might be ok in the body text, but it requires a great deal of knowledge understand any part of it, and as such is not "encyclopædic". As a completely random and hypothetical example - how would someone who took physics at a good university 31 years ago work out what "safety" means in this context? I suggest that at least the introduction be re-written to be actually introductory.

Scottwh (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

3 paragraphs OR removed edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I just did some cleanup and removed three paragraphs containing nothing but OR (original research) that had no single source given. 2A01:C22:AD6D:6600:2149:FD54:3044:C244 (talk) 07:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll find the sources for you, as you removed entirely factual content.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic