Talk:Assumption-based planning
 | Text and/or other creative content from Critical assumption planning was copied or moved into Assumption-based planning with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
Advocates rather than informs edit
This article is written in a manner that advocates the use of the article subject rather than providing objective information.
Statements such as "It is for that reason that ABP should be strongly interwoven into the whole business planning process" should not be in an encyclopedia article.
Also, the article is written in the 2nd person, as if it were an instructional passage. Again, this is not conventional for encyclopedia articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.186.19 (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Merge of Critical assumption planning edit
Critical assumption planning appears to have little or no notability by itself. The Sykes and Dunham paper has only been cited 13 times in 14 years, and it gets a mere handful number of Google hits. Fences&Windows 21:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)