Talk:Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Elektrik Shoos in topic Stub, really?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Stub, really? edit
The description has enough detail that a stub was highly unwarranted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.204.195 (talk) 01:30, April 5, 2011
- Please review WP:STUB. This article is well within the definition. In addition, your consistent removal of stub template from numerous articles without explanation may be considered as disruptive. elektrikSHOOS 02:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, different person here. I've read through the above link on stubs as well as the linked Croughton-London rule. It is my opinion that this is not, under the Croughton-London rule, a stub as there simply isn't much more that can be said about this topic. If any sort of decision is in consideration, I think that the stub tags should be remove on those grounds.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.74.7 (talk) 11:53, May 1, 2013