Talk:Asam Sahitya Sabha

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The name edit

The article name has been changed from the common and widespread Assam Sahitya Sabha to the current uncommon name Axom Xahitya Xabha, on the grounds that it is phonetic. It's only phonetic if you accept that 'x' is the standard representation for the sibilant, and that this representation is being used in the standard language and writing system for the state. Almost all usage is of Assam Sahitya Sabha. I propose that the name be changed back. Imc 09:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I propose that the title be changed to the official usage (How the Sabha spells itself). Chaipau (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Axom Xahitya Xabha is not the standard name that this literary society uses. The standard name written in Roman script that this society uses is Asam Sahitya Sabha. Please use this name in Roman and get rid of all other names.
Kurmaa (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
FWIW, here are some usage statistics based on Google
Ngram: Assam Sahitya Sabha Axom Xahitya Xabha
Google scholar: Assam Sahitya Sabha (189) Axom Xahitya Xabha (1)
Google books: Assam Sahitya Sabha (2,550) Axom Xahitya Xabha (6)
JSTOR: Assam Sahitya Sabha (26); Axom Xahitya Xabha (0)
Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 17:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The page was moved in 2008!! ([1]). Axom Xahitya Xabha is just a redirect. Chaipau (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Use Official Name edit

  • Use the name that Assam literary society itself uses - this is the official name.
  • Multiple names are created by irresponsible Ahom people with Ahom ethnocentrism and Ahom supremicy behavioural-commonalities, for Ahom see ([2]).

Kurmaa (talk) 22:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asam Sahitya Sabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Assam Sahitya Sabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply