Talk:Ariel Meredith/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting Review. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • Hails from is not very good prose, sounds like advertising blurb. Background section needs some more expansion. Father's name for instance? Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

   • Changed to "A native of. . ."--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • [dabfinder.py] reports 5 wiki links to disambiguation pages. All cited references are live, no evidence of WP:OR. Sources appear to be WP:RS Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   • Article is quite minimalist. Is this all there is? Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

   • Pretty much. She is at the start of her career.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   • Appears to conform to WP:NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   • Appears to be stable, no evidence of edit warring. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • The image used is correctly licensed and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article may be passed if above concerns are met. I am putting it on hold Jezhotwells (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC) OK, all seems in order. PASS Jezhotwells (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)