 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- Noticed that there wasn't a lot of information on the article. An internet showed that there aren't that many articles available on the subject (that are in English at least). Would it be possible to utilize a credible source to translate some of the journal excerpts found in the second link you provided? From what I can tell, a physical description of the moth is given at least.
[1] Other than that, there's not much else to suggest. If you knew for sure that the moth didn't have much credible data out on it, maybe that could be suggested in the article as well.Pflanzenliebhaber749 (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)