Talk:Area code 321

Dialing plan

Is it 10-digit dialing throughout all of 321, or just the section overlaying 407? (In other words, would a local call in Brevard County be 7 or 10 digits?) CrazyC83 (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Seven; no area code is required to dial from one 321 number to another. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Are you referring to calls between places which are exclusively in 321? I take it 10 digits would be used for local calls in places served by the 407/321 overlay, but what if you are calling from exclusively-321 location to a 321 area number which is in the 407/321 overlay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

What was this rejected Chicago-area proposal?

I see this comment in this article, and it's about the assignment of this area code (321):

"it was assigned to the area, instead of suburban Chicago"

Please explain this rejected proposal regarding suburban Chicago. Notice that 321 is just a two-digit transposition away from 312, which was the original Chicago-area area code (excluding fringe suburban areas in area 815). 312 has split twice and thus remains only in downtown Chicago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Area code 321. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704090721/http://www.satcomdirect.com:80/main/company/about-us.aspx to http://www.satcomdirect.com/main/company/about-us.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)