Talk:Architecture of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Otr500 in topic Article issues and classification

Untitled edit

Grammar - I am going through this article and other important articles regarding architecture in Sarajevo and Mostar etc. and correcting grammer and changing sentence structure to make it more legible ....I am really sorry if I change the artice too much, but I will try not to as in essence it is it is a great article...

peace from Ireland —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donegalscott (talkcontribs) 21:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:FERHADIJARUSEVINE2.jpg edit

The image Image:FERHADIJARUSEVINE2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg edit

The file File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architecture of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article issues and classification edit

This article is reassessed to C-class. It fails the B-class criteria #1- The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. There is too much unsourced content. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply