Talk:Anti-materiel rifle

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Andy Dingley in topic Boys as an improvement to the Lee Enfield.


Material (spelling) edit

It looks to me as if the more common spelling here is the anglicised "anti-material" rather than "anti-materiel" (seemingly supported by a quick google search). I have moved the page and changed some linked articles. Any objections to this? I'm no military specialist but the spelling looked unusual. Greg 14:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be anti-materiel, the "e" takes an accent (grave?). Never trust google for spelling (confomrity of ignorant masses), use dictionaries. GraemeLeggett 15:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Materiel is the technically correct spelling. Straight from my Webster's New World Dictionary:

Materiel n. 1. Materials and tools necessary to any work, enterprise, etc.; specif., weapons, equipment supplies, etc. of armed forces: distinguished from personnel 2. Weapons and equipment of armed forces in combat

Material n. 1. What a thing is, or may be, made of; elements, parts, or constituents. [raw material] 2. Ideas, notes, sketches, etc., that may be worked up or elaborated; data 3. cloth or other fabric 4. Implements, articles, etc. needed to make or do something [writing materials] --D.E. Watters 15:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Looks like you're right -- "materiel" itself seems to be an anglicisation of "matériel" but if the former is more common we should stick with that.Greg 15:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply


History section edit

Why isn't there one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.221.35 (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aimo Lahti edit

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahti_L-39 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.202.148 (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

civilian edit

Anzio_20mm_rifle has an aericle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.7.100 (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Boys as an improvement to the Lee Enfield. edit

There's now some edit-warring going on, as to whether the Boys was developed to replace the British .303 or the US .30-06 rounds. However both of these are nonsense - there is no development history from the SMLE to the Boys. If anything, the Boys is a British reaction to continental Europe and the use of 12–15mm rifles specifically as anti-tankette rounds. Its origins are with the T-Gewehr and the Lahti, not the SMLE. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply