Talk:Anti-ballistic missile defense countermeasure

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

There is no discussion about the use of hacking to disable countermeasures. I can say no more. Congolese (talk) 07:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Evade" anti-ballistic defenses

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perhaps I am being overly pedantic, but doesn't the term "ballistic" imply an un-powered descent along a geometric curve? To my mind, one might evade anti-missile defenses with a guided missile, but a ballistic missile - much like a "dumb" bomb or artillery shell - must rely on other defenses. This isn't the only article which uses the term "evade" in this way - the article on the Sajjil claims an evasion capability for that misile system. TreacherousWays (talk) 11:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic