Talk:Anoplognathus brunnipennis

A fact from Anoplognathus brunnipennis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the brown Christmas beetle can eat eucalyptus leaves to the point of defoliating the tree?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anoplognathus chloropyrus.

Wikipedia

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Anoplognathus brunnipennis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Taxon swap ?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

see Seidel & Reid 2021

The Beetles that were previously identified as Anoplognathus chloropyrus should be reconsidered as Anoplognathus brunnipennis similarly all previous identifications of Anoplognathus brunnipennis should be reconsidered as Anoplognathus flavipennis Question is should the article here be moved into Anoplognathus brunnipennis as discussed on iNaturalist ? Edisstrange (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic