Proposal to Change from a Redirect to a Distinct Article edit

Hello, all. I'd like to modify this page to be a distinct article. The Angzarr symbol has become a modest celebrity in the font world. Please search Google for "Angzarr" to see a list of articles and videos.

The most authoritative investigation is from U+237C Jonathan Chan at:

-- 2022: U+237C ⍼ RIGHT ANGLE WITH DOWNWARDS ZIGZAG ARROW · Jonathan Chan (ionathan.ch)and

-- 2023: UPDATE: U+237C ⍼ ⍼ · Jonathan Chan (ionathan.ch)

I would use Mr. Chan's findings for the article.

The existing redirect can be integrated as a link.

The page would also link to the Monotype Corp's page and the multiple computer projects listed in Mr. Chan's articles.

What does the community think? Thanks! Wshallwshall (talk) 20:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Redirects Discussion page says,
  • If you want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold!
So, I'm going to be bold! Wshallwshall (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply