Talk:Angola–Serbia relations
Latest comment: 12 years ago by WhiteWriter in topic Merge
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angola–Serbia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge edit
I've written many stubs on bilateral relations, but these relations do not pass WP:GNG. Rather than nominate it for deletion, I suggest we simply merge the one sentence which is not already included in the various foreign relations articles. Where are the multiple independent sources?--TM 22:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, if that is really needed, i will find them. I am from those people that think that international bilateral relation is WP:N by it self. But i will try to expand it a bit. --WhiteWriter speaks 22:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- As you know, that is not the consensus opinion. Considering the distance, relatively small size of both economies and lack of historic interaction, it is best to merge the content than have many small articles which will never be expanded beyond 2 or 3 sentences.--TM 23:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but i really disagree with you. Never? How can we know. Even now i have material to expand it quite a bit. Angola and Serbia agree to strengthen cooperation, Jeremić: Angola - prilika za srpske firme, Angola: Serbia Might Help Rehabilitate Air Force Base, Military training to top Angola-Serbia cooperation, Angola Defence, economic matters top President's meeting with Serbian minister ... Please, give me some time to fix this, and you will see that we have reasons to leave it. OK? I will give you cakes? :) --WhiteWriter speaks 23:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- As you know, that is not the consensus opinion. Considering the distance, relatively small size of both economies and lack of historic interaction, it is best to merge the content than have many small articles which will never be expanded beyond 2 or 3 sentences.--TM 23:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)