Talk:An Introduction to Mechanics

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Primefac in topic Book contents
WikiProject iconArticles for creation Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 25 July 2024 by reviewer S0091 (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconPhysics: Publications Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.
WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Book contents

edit

I'm adding the ToC back in, unless there's a strong reason to ignore the precedent of having it in the article. For example:

"; DROP TABLE Pages; (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hmm...looking at those they all have blocked editors. @Primefac do you know if a ToC normal for articles about text books? @"; DROP TABLE Pages; in the interim no problem with you adding it back. S0091 (talk) 20:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Completely unnecessary to have it. I don't think there is an MOS or anything on it, but it's not encyclopedic information that needs to be included. Primefac (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply