Talk:American Chemistry Council

POV

This is so POV!!! --Crio de la Paz 16:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Being working on it trying to reflect the different POV regarding this insitution in a NPOV manner (I hope!). --Crio de la Paz 04:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, duh, ACC is literally a lobbyist “think tank”. Something that was considered treason and got one 20 years is prison, at least if you went by the law, back in the days. Before the media started to treat them like they are not, and it’s now done openly. Something that would have been a huge taboo even up to the 90s.
And the ACC’s entire purpose of existence is to brainwash people (“PR”) to maximize profit (aka the money taken from us, that nothing is exchanged for… as opposed to actually earned money). It’s de-facto a still legalized criminal organization.
They will have literally employees whose job it is to edit this article every once in a while, to make them look better, while keeping criticisms in for the sole purpose of making them look bad. (Look at how bad the criticisms section portrays anyone who doesn’t Hail Corporate. Like it’s only “some” and they only “believe” it, and it’s totally not a fact that everybody but them knows.) — 2A0A:A546:970A:1:55D9:8F9B:2059:427C (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Also, psychologically, as well as physically, there is no such thing as a “neutral” POV. It’s literally neurologically impossible, due t how brains work. It’s just what readers say, when they want the communicated information to conform to their own views, and writers say, when they want their manipulating others into their beliefs to go down easier. — 2A0A:A546:970A:1:55D9:8F9B:2059:427C (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Non-neutral point of view again

This article is heavily skewed toward criticism of the organization. I cleaned up some of it, but I think it could really use some balance still, so I have added the NPOV tag. Gnome de plume (talk) 19:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Lobbyist corporate troll detected. It’s literally heavily biased towards extremist Hail Corporate ultra-libertarian-American attitudes.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Chemistry Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050505145759/http://www.publicintegrity.org/lobby/profile.aspx?act=clients&year=2003&cl=L000282 to http://www.publicintegrity.org/lobby/profile.aspx?act=clients&year=2003&cl=L000282

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Does it make sense to reproduce their list of members here?

I know it's literally on their website, but I was wondering if it made sense for that information to be here directly, much like movie actors list of performances are on their pages even though other movie specific sites provide it. 122.219.71.210 (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)