Talk:America's Climate Security Act of 2007
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reaction Section edit
This section, if not the entire article is totally in favor of the bill. The Wall Street Journal and the Economist (outlets with actual economic knowledge) are against it, yet there is no mention of them. Total POV at this point. 98.218.141.145 (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Why don't you add to it then? isn't that the point of this little venture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.93.66 (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
filibuster vote? edit
could we a post a list of who voted for the filibuster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.66.62 (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV edit
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)