Talk:Alvanley

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment Report edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
Photos need to be added.
~~Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.)~~ - added 4 December 2015
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)

DDStretch (talk) 19:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Matthew Jones edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not at all sure about that Matthew Jones reference in the article - it refers to a disambiguous page and is not cited at all. Will leave it for now! Pixie2000 07:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it. Unless it can be verified, I think it should be removed. DDStretch (talk) 19:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic