Talk:Althea Gibson/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Comments - a good piece of work, mainly technical issues... (P.S. I was asked by Ritchie333 to help out with the Women in Green project to get to 25 GAs before the end of the year, so this is my first review of that project's material...)

  • "French Championship" is piped to a redirect.
  • As is Wimbledon, U.S. Nationals and US Open too.
  • And why "U.S." and then "US"? Consistency.
  • I would also avoid using two piped links to the same target article.
  • I think it more relevant to link Associated Press Female Athlete of the Year than Associated Press.
  • Robert Ryland is usually known as Bob, and has an article.
  • Where is her height referenced?
  • And her handedness?
  • And her highest ranking?
  • "organized sports.[9][2] " numerical order for refs.
  • You have "(FAMU)" but then never use it.
    • I left it, because I think it is an alternate common name of the school. (It's not there to be an abbreviation.) Sportsfan77777 (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • (While USTA rules officially prohibited racial or ethnic discrimination, players qualified for the Nationals by accumulating points at sanctioned tournaments, most of which were held at white-only clubs.)[21] This should either be a regular sentence or a footnote, not a parenthesised sentence mid-prose.
  • You haven't explained what USTA is before using it.
  • Lester Rodney has an article.
  • You don't link Wimbledon in the first para of the Amateur career section but you do link it in the second para...
  • "Singles" and "Doubles" are piped to redirects and to the same article...
  • Shirley Fry is piped to a redirect back to Shirley Fry.
  • "1957 was, in her ..." avoid staring sentences with numbers.
  • "Robert F. Wagner, Jr." these kinds of names no longer use a comma.
  • There's a season article for the Wightman Cup at 1957 Wightman Cup.
  • "Althea Gibson is congratulated..." no need for "Althea".
  • " Queen Elizabeth II" is all linked but in the caption just the "Elizabeth II" of "Queen Elizabeth II " is linked, be consistent.
  • " Waldorf-Astoria Hotel" not hyphenated according to our article.
  • " nearly $1 million" not sure you really need to link this, and certainly not this far into the article when $ has already been used.
  • "Newark, NJ, " spell out NJ.
  • "Theodore Roosevelt Award, " is unnecessarily piped.
  • "Althea Gibson's 1956 Wimbledon ..." again no need for the first name.
  • What is sourcing all the material (including set scores) in the Grand Slam finals section?
  • In sortable tables, all linked items should be linked every time.
    • I'm not that against adding these links for this article, but it's pretty standard to link just once in all other tennis articles. (There isn't much reason for these tables to be sortable, but that's also standard use.) Sportsfan77777 (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
      • Well the problem comes with once the tables are re-sorted, the linked item doesn't necessarily appear first, so I'd suggest either all are linked, none are linked, or the tables are made unsortable. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • There needs to be a key to explain what (2) means (for example).
  • Page ranges need consistent approach, i.e. you have pp. 220–224 and pp. 167–8.
  • Ref 28 needs fixing.
    • Fixed, but I don't know how to link the book like in the other ones. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Use a consistent date format for all publication dates and a consistent format for all accessdates. They don't have to be the same format, but it makes no sense to me at least why they would be different.
  • No spaced hyphens in the ref titles, make sure they're spaced en-dashes.
  • Are all those external links necessary? If they're so useful, could some of them not be incorporated into the main part of the article?

That's all I have, so I'll put this on hold for now. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for reviewing the article, and for helping out with the project! I addressed all of the comments above. Let me know if there is anything else. And @Ritchie333: thanks for finding a reviewer! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Couple of responses inline above. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: I added a reply. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy with this now, it easily passes the GA criteria and the work done above has made it even better. Good stuff. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply