Talk:Alternative Economic Strategy

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

bad article edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

1) The article is entirely dependent on one primary source (Benn's diaries). This is not appropriate. 2) The article says nothing about the details of the AES. Its written rather as a political justification for the AES. Based on the sourcing and the content, it clearly has serious NPOV problems. 3) The article never references the actual document which represented the strategy. 75.17.124.140 (talk) 00:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

problem claim edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"With Britain in economic crisis in October 1976, Benn again put forward the AES with the support of Peter Shore in Cabinet."

This is not correct. Peter Shore put forward his own different proposal on the economy which was presented on December 1st along with the Alternative Economic Strategy. Peter Shore had his own different point of view. While he disagreed with the policy of the cabinet as a whole, he was not an absolute supporter of the AES. See "The IMF Crisis of 1976 and British Politics: Keynesian Social Democracy" p. 138-139

As well, its not correct to say that the cabinet rejected the AES in December 1976. The AES was one of multiple papers that were presented to the cabinet on December 1st on economic subjects. It (AES) can be said to have received almost no support in the cabinet and been closely questioned, but cannot be said to have been rejected. It was simply one of a number of ideas that were presented and it was not even the united policy of the left in the cabinet. 75.17.124.140 (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic