Talk:Alpraham
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Cheshire may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Assessment Report
edit- Stub needs to be massively expanded.
- Photos need to be added.
- Infobox needs to be added.
- References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
IP edits in May 2015
editThe IP who made several edits here in May 2015 also vandalised the population figure in Calveley. I suspect even their less obviously silly additions are invented. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alpraham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324151704/http://www.pointtopoint.co.uk/index.html to http://www.pointtopoint.co.uk/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)