Talk:Alexander Robertson & Sons

Untitled

Some times one comes across a beautiful Wiki page, and this is one such page (user:alexandermacpherson) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandermacpherson (talk • contribs) 22:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with image of Charlotte Elizabeth

Hi, I can assure you this is my own photograph. I don't have time to edit it (slow computer), but will do so later.

Alexandermacpherson (talk • —Preceding undated comment added 12:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC).

Image copyright problem with Image:A - Alexander Robertson.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Robertsonal!
We thank you for uploading Image:A - Alexander Robertson.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 20:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Robertsonal Now flagged for speedy deletion (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)robertsonal

Image copyright problem with Image:Aerial Yard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aerial Yard.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Robertsonal Issue now resolved. —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC).

Image copyright problem with Image:SovereignSceptre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SovereignSceptre.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Robertsonal Now flagged for speedy deletion.

Updates Nov 11 2009

John, Thanks for all the corrections and advice. (Robertsonsyard (talk) 19:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)).

work

This page needs work. It has redundancies and is generally inconcise. Plus a general history of yachting has no place here. Maybe we should start the History of Yachting article? With a focus on New York, Boston, Newport, Cowes, Kiel, perhaps Le Havre and obviously the River Clyde. We could use what is here and also my timeline of rating rules here. Nuttyrave (talk) 11:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

History

I agree, and thanks for the editing. The section was included to place the detailed story about one small yard into a wider historical context, so that readers could appreciate roughly where the yard fitted into the general history of yachting on the Clyde. Please feel free to use any of the section in your new entry on the History of Yachting. Robertsonsyard. Robertsonsyard (talk) 07:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Update

Working on a database to try and capture the history of all boats built at Robertson's Yard and so far, have been able to account for 480, out of 500. Currently looking into the more detailed histories of the foremost wooden yachts built there (15-metre, 12-metre, oceangoing cruiser/racers, 8-metre, 6-metre). Information on any of the boats, especially the ones still sailing, would be greatly appreciated. Contact can be made via robyardsb@hotmail.co.uk

Thanks Robertsonsyard (talk) 06:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

SY Nahlin

The article refers to the SY Nahlin as being built by Robertson and Sons. I have found this vessel from the correct period, but it is indicated to have been built by another firm.

--The past is best left remembered. (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

SY Nahlin's TENDER

The entry indicates the TENDER was built at Robertson's Yard, not the actual S Y Nahlin (which was built at J Brown's on the Clyde). Robertson's Yard specialised in building tenders (motor boats, lifeboats, owners motor launch, sailing dinghies etc) for larger yachts/ships (over 120 ft) which were usually constructed in the big shipyards further up the Clyde.

Tender: Robertson's Yard Boat No 186. 30', 6 ton, Owner's Motor Launch: double skin mahogany; 2 cabins; electric lighting; 35 bhp Thornecroft engine. Built for the Steam Yacht Nahlin, owned by Lady Yule of Glasgow. The 296' SY Nahlin was built in 1930 by John Brown & Co Clydebank and designed by G L Watson & Co. Robertson's Yard also supplied a Crew's Tender, which was boat No 187.

Robertsonsyard (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexander Robertson.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Alexander Robertson.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files missing permission as of 21 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Alexander Robertson.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexander Robertson.jpg Permission

User and permission provided.