Talk:Alaska Airlines Flight 261/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Gerald Waldo Luis in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

So I've looked at this article several times. It has a neutral tone, a good length, sufficiently sourced (the majority from the NTSB report) and uses media. It's already a B-class artice (which is just behind good class) so I think it might be ready to be rank as a good article. Tigerdude9 (talk) 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tigerdude9, so I'll be reviewing this article. Just wanted to note that you shouldn't be the person opening this page, as you're the nominator. You should open a nomination page if this is a FAC, but not if this is a GAN. I changed the reviewer name to me, anyway, so this doesn't have to be deleted. This may take time, since I'm also active in updating situations regarding Sriwijaya Air Flight 182. GeraldWL 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Tigerdude9, can you respond to my comments below? GeraldWL 14:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes I can. Tigerdude9 (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Gerald Waldo Luis Update: I've done nearly everything you suggested in the comments, but I could not find any free photos of the actual aircraft involved. Tigerdude9 (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • Unless the claims are controversial or it's not being talked about in the body, leads don't need to have citations. GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Tigerdude9, there is still one citation in the lead. Is it needed? GeraldWL 11:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
    The claim isn't controversial, so probably not. Tigerdude9 (talk) 15:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Hmm... no free images of the actual aircraft? GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Background edit

  • Link "McDonnell-Douglas MD-83". GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Link "Alaska Airlines". GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Captain Edward (Ted) Thompson"-- Why the brackets? If it's the nickname, then probably use quotations instead. GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Link "Seattle". GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Delink "Seattle" in the "Passengers" section. GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Initial flight segment edit

First dive and recovery edit

  • Link trim tab within "trim system". GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "130 to 140 pounds (580 to 620 N)"-- is "N" Newton? GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Suggest adding the abbreviation "ATC" next to "air traffic control". GeraldWL 15:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Second dive and crash edit


Wreckage recovery and analysis edit

  • "All wreckage recovered from the crash site was unloaded at the Seabee's Naval Construction Battalion Center Port Hueneme, California, for examination and documentation by NTSB investigators." What exactly does "documentation" mean?
    • Documentations refers to evidence of official information. Tigerdude9 (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "As the jackscrew rotates, it moves up or down through the (fixed) acme nut"-- why is "fixed" bracketed?
    • It doesn't appear to be part of the report as it's not in quotes. Tigerdude9 (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Identification of passengers edit

  • "All occupants were identified"-- occupants sounds vaguely... legal. Maybe change it with "passengers".

Aircraft design and certification issues edit

  • Tigerdude9, "Maintenance procedures such as lubrication and end-play checks were to catch any excessive wear before it progressed to a point of failure of the system. The aircraft designers assumed that at least one set of threads would always be present to carry the loads placed on it, therefore the effects of catastrophic failure of this system were not considered, and no "fail-safe" provisions were needed" is not cited. GeraldWL 07:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
    • I found sections in the report to support that claim. Tigerdude9 (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
      Tigerdude9, just wanna make sure, have you addressed all the comments above? Only after so I can continue, just to make sure that you're still engaged. GeraldWL 07:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
      • Yes. I've made the changes. Tigerdude9 (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
        • OK, I'll move on to next round of comments. GeraldWL 06:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
        Tigerdude9, let me know if you've resolved all the below comments. GeraldWL 05:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • (Jackscrew design improvement) "In 2001, NASA recognized the risk"-- extend the word "NASA" to "National Aeronautics and Space Administration", and link to the article.
  • (John Liotine) "and in 2000, Liotine filed a libel suit against the airline." Link libel suit.
  • (Aftermath) "Steve Miletich of the Seattle Times"-- change to "Steve Miletich of The Seattle Times".
  • (Aftermath) "Subsequent DNA testing proved these claims to be false." Link Genealogical DNA test within "DNA testing".
  • (Aftermath) "The crash has appeared in various advance fee fraud ("419") email scams". Link email and scams.
  • Why is the section "Notable passengers" in the Aftermath section? Shouldn't it be part of the "Passengers" subsection?
  • (In popular culture) "which was called "Fatal Fix" in the United Kingdom, Australia and Asia." Needs citation.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed