Talk:Alan de Neville (landholder)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 16:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nominator: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) at 14:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


GA criteria edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   okay!
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   (NA)
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):   (NA)

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Comments edit

  • Do we need that citation in the lead?
  • "in Lincolnshire" — I'd say "in Lincolnshire, England"
  • "He is easily confused" — often? or it it an English English thing?
  • "Neville held lands" — The prose seems like a continuation of the lead. We should be mentioning his first name at his firs instance in the prose, and also "(floruit 1168)"
  • "of Chief Forester" — my reading of MOS:JOBTITLE is that this should not be capitalized. Le me know if I am wrong.
  • "The Complete Peerage entry" — 'The' is a part of the title: The Complete Peerage

That is pretty much all there is to say. Sourcing is impeccable. @Ealdgyth, I wouldn't formally put on hold unless you want me to. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to be busy for the rest of the afternoon and evening, so can't promise I'll get to these before tomorrow ... so up to you on whether you want to put it on formal hold or not. I'm easy either way. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think I got all these... Ealdgyth (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Great, promoted. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply