Talk:Al-'Abbasiyya

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


expansion edit

for expanding this article, see: User:Tiamut/Zeita#Yehudiya_.3D_Al-.27Abbasiyya, Huldra (talk) 00:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

that tomb edit

Note that the Islamic prophet "Nabi Huda ibn Sayyidna Ya'aqub" was exactly the same (mythological) person as the Jewish "Yehuda ben Ya'akov". So it wasn't a case of misattributing the tomb. Benvenisti's point is that it wasn't venerated by Jews until after 1948. But Benvenisti is not entirely correct, since SWP III, 258, says that the Samaritans held that Yehuda was buried there. There's another traditional tomb of Huda near the 1949 Israel-Syria armistice line [1]. Here is serious support for Benvenisti: Doron Bar, Mizrahim and the development of sacred space in the State of Israel, 1948-1968. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies, 8: 3, 267–285:

If before 1948 the tombs of Benjamin and Judah were Muslim consecrations (Wakf) and the majority of pilgrims there were Muslims, then after the war they were “converted” and developed as part of the Jewish sacred space in Israel. This process was connected to the consigning of Mizrahim to temporary settlements (ma`abarot), small townships, and ruined Arab villages in that region. (p278)
The process that took place at the Tomb of Judah, son of Jacob, further south and in the middle of the small township of Yahud, was very similar to that of Benjamin’s tomb, but this happened only during the 1960s. Jewish settlers, mainly immigrants from Turkey and Yemen, settled in the ruined Arab village of Yehudiya at the end of the 1948 war, but during the 1950s the abandoned Muslim shrine was not used by the local Jews and it was deteriorating. Only during the 1960s, upon the arrival of additional immigrants from North Africa, did the attitude towards the former Muslim shrine change as the Ministry of Religious Affairs began to take greater interest in it. It is difficult to tell whether this initiative came from “below” (namely as a result of local interest) or whether it was the Ministry’s enterprise as it began to restore the tomb. (p279-280)

Zerotalk 15:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notes: SWP, II, p. 258, Guerin, 1868, Judee I, p. 341 -342;

Interestingly, the "alternative" tomb by Tibirias is also noted in le Strange, pp. 341 and 521, so it goes at least back to Ibn Battutas days. And where exactly is "Ruhin" located?

-Huldra (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al-'Abbasiyya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply