Talk:Ageostrophy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sentrifugal force edit

It is bad practice to refer to centrifugal force as if it were a real phenomenon, cf. centripetal force. Furthermore, I question whether the reference is valid anyway, as the "centrifugal" effect is exactly what balances the radial force to create geostrophic movement in the first place (the idealized case). Friction is the essential example of ageostrohpy as far as I can understand, but also external forces (forces other than the one towards the center) affecting the course of the fluid, and non-circular force fields (isobars) implying the existence of such forces. Geir Halbo, 17th May 2015 15:00 EST 90.149.34.81 (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please confirm classification edit

The highest WikiProject classification for Ageostrophy is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ageostrophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply