Talk:Agar gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Would this gun truly be considered similar to a revolver cannon? While it does technically use a "multi-chamber design", the "chambers" are much closer in design and usage to reusable metallic cartridge casings. Chitoryu12 (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wrong terminology.

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

By definition a "machine gun" uses pressure from the burning powder to cycle the action. This gun does not function in that manor therefore it is not a machine gun. 67.237.186.251 (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic