Talk:Aestivation hypothesis

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aestivation hypothesis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Comment on ‘The aestivation hypothesis for resolving Fermi’s paradox’" was recently published edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Comment on ‘The aestivation hypothesis for resolving Fermi’s paradox’ was recently published on arxiv.org. The lead author is the eminent authority on computational entropy, Charles Bennett. The Comment criticizes several aspects of the original paper and basically claims that an advanced civilization would not have a need for aestivation until the temperature of the universe decreased. I'm not skilled enough an editor to add this development to the entry, so I am posting this notification in the Talk section in the hope that someone with such skills will update the entry. Nick (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done Somebody has since added it --Distelfinck (talk) 10:55, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. I wish whoever added the reference wasn't anonymous so I could thank them. Nick (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic