This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Could the author of this article please attempt to rewrite this article so that it makes sense to someone other than the author of this article? I have a vague sense of what it is attempting to say, but only afte reading it three times. Also, a cited source is a must.--Hraefen20:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is not just poorly written but descends in incomprehensible gibberish in places. I will attempt to edit a little but if someone with keener insight as to what is intended here, perhaps he might take a shot. Sych (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
